Insights

Analysis of how tax disputes form, evolve, and are decided.

Background Pattern 2 with Caselaw Insights text - Choose the Right Beneficiary to Avoid Tax Pitfalls, unique expertise in overturning CRA reassessments by Counter Tax Litigators LLP.

The Federal Court of Appeal’s (“FCA”) decision in Enns v. Canada[1] clarifies how “spouse” is defined for purposes of paragraph 160(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”). This decision carries significa...

Background Pattern 2 with Strategy Insights text - CRA's Objection Process: Full Engagement vs. Strategic Disengagement, unique expertise in overturning CRA reassessments by Counter Tax Litigators LLP.

When CRA issues a Notice of Reassessment (NoR), taxpayers who contest it face a structural choice: remain in CRA’s self-adjudication stage at objection, or transition to the Tax Court’s independent ov...

CRA objection stage as self-review — limits and risks in complex interpretive tax disputes

This article was prepared by Counter LLP’s Tax Controversy and Litigation practice, with contributions from Peter Aprile, Senior Counsel; James Roberts, Partner; and Jennifer Mak, Associate. The CRA o...

Publication Update: Income Tax Penalties in Canada, strategic tax dispute navigation with deep legal expertise by Counter Tax Litigators LLP.

Counter Tax Litigators LLP has contributed an updated chapter on Income Tax Penalties in Canada, authored by Peter Aprile, James Roberts, and Jennifer Mak, and published by Thomson Reuters in its Tax ...