CRA’s Related Party Initiative

Part II – aka the “High Net Worth Project”

1:36

Yesterday’s Ontario Bar Association Tax Law Section Conference was a great opportunity for our firm to discuss the Canada Revenue Agency’s (“CRA”) new Related Party Initiative (“RPI”), which targets high net-worth Canadian taxpayers.

The CRA consulted with the Australian Tax Office (“ATO”), which initiated a similar project in or about 1996. At that time, the ATO simply read the Fortune 500 lists to choose targets. The CRA has developed an algorithm to choose targets. It is estimated that the CRA has dedicated over 50 employees to the RPI Teams, including risk assessment officers and large case auditors, i.e., the CRA’s most senior auditors. In addition, the CRA has appointed CRA Special Enforcement Program employees and Aggressive Tax Planning Section employees to the RPI Teams.

As discussed in our firm’s previous post, the CRA is initiating RPI audits by sending a 20-page questionnaire to taxpayers selected for audit. The RPI questionnaire asks taxpayers to disclose sensitive tax information, including, but not limited to, tax planning documents.

A former CRA employee with experience in these matters echoed our firm’s previous recommendation that taxpayers who receive a RPI questionnaire should retain tax legal counsel and that taxpayers should work with tax legal counsel to retain accountants. This way, taxpayers may mitigate risk, protect communications using solicitor-client privilege and identify the information/documents that should not be disclosed to the CRA based on solicitor-client privilege.

For additional analysis, see our Insights.

Insights

CRA Settlement After a Reassessment: When Resolution Becomes Unstable | Zhang v. HMK illustrates how resolution may not be treated as final inside the institution

Tax Court of Canada decision on CRA settlement after reassessment, showing how accepted settlement terms may not end the dispute when CRA and DOJ continue pulling the file back. (Zhang v HMK)

A CRA reassessment and dispute do not start from a neutral position. They shape the dispute, now and later. This article explains how the record develops and the impact on teh range of outcomes.

Notice of Objection Failed to Define the Dispute | Some objection-stage failures are obvious. Others remain invisible and lead to the same result. (941624 Alberta Ltd. v. HMK)

CRA reassessment and notice of objection. Large corporation regime. How a failure to define the dispute can stop an appeal early or narrow what can be argued later.

Cross-Border Rental & Withholding Reassessment Control - When the structure holds, and where it can still be moved - C&W Offshore Ltd. v. HMK

A cross-border equipment rental led to a withholding tax reassessment under Part XIII. This case shows how much of the exposure can still be reduced when the structure holds.

DAC Investment Holdings and the Widening Lens on Tax Regime Integrity

Federal Court of Appeal decision in DAC Investment Holdings (2026 FCA 35) shows how GAAR disputes can turn on tax regime integrity rather than individual provisions.

Bakorp Confirms That Large Corporation Objections Define the Outcome | How subsection 165(1.11) limited the appeal before the tax issue was ever examined

In Bakorp, the FCA held that subsection 165(1.11) confines a large corporation’s appeal to the issues specified in its Notice of Objection, dismissing the case without reviewing the tax merits.

Explore more insights >

Related Insights

CRA’s Related Party Initiative

Insights