After a CRA reassessment, management must make decisions while the information is incomplete. Those early decisions shape the tax dispute, and lender and board scrutiny.
.jpg?width=120&name=Counter%20Tax%20Litigators%20Logo%20Stacked%20(MidnightBlue%20on%20White).jpg)
The Tax Court’s Bench and Bar Committee and the Canadian Bar Association’s Tax and Charities sections have sponsored a new resolution proposing that the Canadian Bar Association renew its efforts to persuade Parliament to expand the Tax Court of Canada’s exclusive jurisdiction for all tax-related matters including judicial review of the Minister of National Revenue’s and the Canada Revenue Agency’s discretionary decisions under the voluntary disclosure program and the taxpayer relief provisions.
Supporters of the resolution believe that consolidating all tax matters within a specialized and expert court will improve cost, efficiency and service to taxpayers. Critics believe that the Federal Court provides good service to taxpayers and warn that the proposed change is a major substantive change.
We believe that this debate is important and any discussion that may lead to improved service, efficiency and access to justice in tax matters is gladly received. Unfortunately, the Canadian Bar Association’s governing council has decided to postpone its voting on the resolution until its next meeting in February 2012.
After a CRA reassessment, management must make decisions while the information is incomplete. Those early decisions shape the tax dispute, and lender and board scrutiny.
Some tax disputes persist even when the outcome is inevitable, and litigation leads to greater sunk costs without any opportunity for recovery.
After a CRA reassessment, management makes decisions under unresolved conditions. This is not a failure of diligence; it is the normal operating environment.
Keybrand shows that when a dominant explanation takes hold, later advocacy is either constrained or given room to operate.
This insight explains how management's initial framing of a CRA dispute with partners, lenders, and boards will shape stakeholders' evaluation of management's performance.
Redpath shows how transfer pricing disputes can shift late. Strategic venue choice counters systemic advantage and protects business strategy.