Offshore Asset & T1135 Risk: Azmayesh-Fard v HMK & Strategic Dispute Planning

Global data-sharing is reshaping CRA enforcement - early legal positioning provides control.
Offshore Asset & T1135 Risk: Azmayesh-Fard v HMK & Strategic Dispute Planning
Offshore Asset & T1135 Risk: Azmayesh-Fard v HMK & Strategic Dispute Planning
3:41

Key Takeaways from Azmayesh-Fard v HMK

  • Enforcement is accelerating. CRA’s access to global financial data has fundamentally changed how offshore holdings are detected.
  • Risk is dynamic. Proactive tax dispute monitoring and planning - not just voluntary disclosure - leads to better outcomes.
  • Timing is critical. Taxpayers who assess exposure and adjust positioning before CRA action maintain control.

CRA’s Growing Offshore Reach 

Case Insight: Azmayesh-Fard v. The King (2025 TCC 20)

The Tax Court ruled that the taxpayer’s failure to report a Swiss bank account for nearly two decades constituted misrepresentation due to neglect or carelessness. This allowed the CRA to reassess multiple years beyond the normal limitation period and apply penalties. However, the Tax Court also vacated penalties for later years, reinforcing that while CRA has significant enforcement tools, it must still establish proper grounds for reassessments.

This case underscores how structured foreign banking arrangements are increasingly subject to detection and enforcement. It highlights how global information-sharing agreements, beneficial ownership registries, and evolving audit strategies make non-disclosure a high-risk approach. The broader trend is clear: waiting for CRA action limits available options, whereas proactive dispute planning provides control.

Connect with our team

Strategic Positioning: Managing Risk Before It Escalates

Sophisticated taxpayers don’t wait until an audit notice arrives. Instead, they integrate dispute planning into broader financial decision-making, ensuring:

  • Risk is actively assessed on specific "check-in dates" and key intervals, not just when filing returns.
  • Legal positioning is optimized so that if scrutiny arises, the response is controlled and strategic.
  • Adjustments are made proactively based on shifting CRA enforcement patterns.

Options Before CRA Initiates Contact

For those not yet on CRA’s radar, a structured legal strategy provides more flexibility than reactive disclosure:

  1. Legal Risk Mapping: Understand your current exposure and identify preemptive actions.
  2. Strategic Check-Ins: Regularly assess whether shifting enforcement trends warrant action.
  3. Preemptive Filing vs. Holding Position: Weighing the optimal timing for voluntary disclosure or structured response planning.

Options After CRA Initiates Action

If CRA has already flagged an issue, the focus shifts to damage control and dispute resolution:

  • Objection Strategy: Filing a Notice of Objection can challenge penalties or reassessments before they escalate.
  • Tax Court Planning: Recent Tax Court cases (Douglas v. The Queen, Moore v. The Queen) show that well-handled appeals can overturn penalties.
  • Positioning for Negotiation: The strength of your initial response significantly influences the outcome. 

Closing Remarks

The Tax Court's Azmayesh-Fard decision and evolving enforcement trends reinforce the importance of proactive dispute strategies in managing T1135-related risks. 

As global tax enforcement tightens, those who plan ahead are better equipped to navigate complexities and mitigate risk. Those who address potential issues early can better navigate disclosure, objections, and legal challenges. Understanding the nuances of CRA’s approach to foreign asset compliance - and making high-quality decisions - can significantly improve a taxpayer’s legal position and economic outcome.

A proactive approach to dispute resolution ensures taxpayers can anticipate challenges and make decisions aligned with their risk profile and objectives.

Connect with our team

Insights

Background Pattern 2 with Caselaw Insights text - Choose the Right Beneficiary to Avoid Tax Pitfalls, unique expertise in overturning CRA reassessments by Counter Tax Litigators LLP.

The Enns v. Canada decision clarifies 'spouse' under section 160 of the Income Tax Act, impacting RRSP and TFSA estate planning. Jennifer Mak, along with other expert tax lawyers on our team, breaks down key insights.

Tax partner from Price Waterhouse Coopers commending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their hands-on, focused, and diligent approach to tax law.

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

Senior VP client with an accounting and finance background praising Counter Tax Litigators for their expertise, dedication, and businesslike approach to tax dispute litigation.

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Accountant representing Fuller Landau LLP praising Counter Tax Litigators for superior communication in resolving client tax disputes.

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Retired CEO client recommending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their competence, honesty, and exceptional handling of legal matters.

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Successful business leader praising Counter Tax Litigators’ team for their professional, efficient representation, leading to a highly satisfactory decision.

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Business leader praising the Counter Tax Litigators team for going above and beyond in handling a significant tax dispute.

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.