Our recommended 3-step process to respond to the CRA’s annual letter campaign

Our recommended 3-step process to respond to the CRA’s annual letter campaign
Our recommended 3-step process to respond to the CRA’s annual letter campaign
2:56

The Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) announced, and now initiated, its 5th Annual Letter Campaign (the “Campaign”).**  The CRA is in the process of sending 33,000 letters to taxpayers that have claimed business losses, rental losses and other employment expenses on line 229 of their tax and benefit returns.  The CRA’s risk-assessment system has revealed that these types of taxpayers are higher risk to file non-compliant tax returns.

It is important that taxpayers appreciate that the receipt of the letter does not mean that their tax returns contain an error or that the CRA will audit the subject tax return.

The Campaign is designed to turn taxpayers into no-cost CRA auditors that review previously filed tax returns, identify and correct the errors.  In addition to raising revenue without any audit costs, the CRA may attempt to use a taxpayer’s failure to correct errors to support the imposition of penalties at a later date.

It is important that taxpayers appreciate that the receipt of the letter does not mean that their tax returns contain an error or that the CRA will audit the subject tax return.  Also, the Income Tax Act does not require taxpayers to correct past errors.  A taxpayer’s failure to correct an error is not a criminal offence and should not be used to support the imposition of a penalty.  Last, the CRA’s ability to reassess is – in some cases – restricted.  For example, if the taxation year to which the error relates is statute-barred and the error is an error in law or if the CRA is unable to prove that the taxpayer’s negligence or carelessness caused the error.

Simply put, if a taxpayer receives a letter, we recommend that the taxpayer pause, take a breath and gather the information needed to decide on the best course of conduct.

Our Recommended 3-Step Process

Taxpayers who receive these letters should employ the following three-step analysis to help decide the best way to proceed. 

  • First, taxpayers should review the subject tax return.  If the review reveals an error, taxpayers should determine whether the error is isolated or whether it impacts other taxation years.
  • Second, taxpayers should meet with a tax lawyer to discuss the error, the circumstances surrounding the error and the amount at stake. 
  • Third, taxpayers should gain an understanding of the type of error and actual reassessment risks.

The three-step analysis will allow taxpayers to understand and weigh their various options including, but not limited to, choosing not to correct the error on the basis that the CRA’s ability to reassess is limited or choosing to to correct the error under the Voluntary Disclosures Program.  Simply put, if a taxpayer receives a letter, we recommend that the taxpayer pause, take a breath and gather the information needed to decide on the best course of conduct.

**Please note that the CRA has not revealed any information or results related to its previous Annual Letter Campaigns.  However, we have recently submitted a request under the Access to Information and Privacy Directorate to uncover the statistics that the CRA is tracking related to the Campaign.  We will publish the CRA’s response and any material in due course. Stay tuned.

Insights

Tax partner from Price Waterhouse Coopers commending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their hands-on, focused, and diligent approach to tax law.

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

Senior VP client with an accounting and finance background praising Counter Tax Litigators for their expertise, dedication, and businesslike approach to tax dispute litigation.

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Accountant representing Fuller Landau LLP praising Counter Tax Litigators for superior communication in resolving client tax disputes.

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Retired CEO client recommending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their competence, honesty, and exceptional handling of legal matters.

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Successful business leader praising Counter Tax Litigators’ team for their professional, efficient representation, leading to a highly satisfactory decision.

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Business leader praising the Counter Tax Litigators team for going above and beyond in handling a significant tax dispute.

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.

Award from Legal 500 Canada recognizing Counter Tax Litigators as an Elite Tax Boutique for 2024.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2023-24
Excellence Award from Canadian Law Awards recognizing Peter Aprile as Litigator of the Year.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, awarded for highest overall client rating.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2021-22.
Lexpert 2022 Rising Star award for Natalie Worsfold, recognizing her excellence in tax litigation.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, peer-rated for highest level of professional excellence.
FT Innovative Lawyers award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for advanced systems enhancing tax lawyers' capabilities and outcomes.
Precedent 2022 Innovation Award honoring Counter Tax Litigators for innovation in tax litigation reports.
Fastcase 50 award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for thought leadership and innovation in tax litigation.