Preparing for Discovery in a Tax Dispute

Tips for Private Company Officers and HNW Taxpayers Getting Ready to Answer Questions Under Oath
Preparing for Discovery in a Tax Dispute
Preparing for Discovery in a Tax Dispute
4:02

You increase the odds of getting the desired outcome when you give effective discovery answers. Here are some tips to help you.

Stick to the Facts & Tell the Truth

Be specific and conservative with your answers. Do not overgeneralize. 

Tell the truth. And, sometimes, that will mean saying “I don’t know” and “I don’t remember”. Do not guess or speculate.

We win tax cases, in part, because people believe what we say.

When your answers are accurate and you tell the truth, you increase our odds. 

Listen to Each Question

There is a natural human tendency to listen to the first part of a question, then to stop listening to the question, jump to a conclusion, and start formulating an answer. Be aware of this tendency and try to avoid it.

Listen to the questioner until they have completed the question. Do not interrupt.

Answer the specific question.

Do not answer a question the CRA’s lawyer didn’t ask.

Say You Don’t Know

There is another natural human tendency to want to answer a question even if you are not sure of the answer. Be aware of this tendency and try to avoid it.

Do not guess. Say you don’t know.

Say You Don’t Understand

The CRA’s lawyer should ask questions in a straightforward way. For example, they should avoid compound questions. This is their task. Do not help them do their job.

Be sure you understand the question. If you feel unsure about the question, ask for clarification. Do not try to reword the CRA’s lawyer’s question.

Ask the CRA’s lawyer to repeat or rephrase their question.

Be Brief

Give short and responsive answers to the CRA lawyer’s questions. Do not explain or justify your answer.

Aim to respond to the question in 40 words or less.

Please remember the general rule: what you say in discovery will not help your case; it can only hurt you. 

Answer the question and stop talking.

Do not volunteer information.

Do not give speeches.

Be Informative

Respond to the CRA’s lawyer’s question (even if it hurts). If you try to evade answering a valid question, you will make things worse. If the question is improper, we will object. But if the question is proper, the Rules require you to answer it.

Answer calmly and matter-of-factly. 

CounterBlogPattern(2)_AquaBlueFlat

Be Polite

We act civilly because its the strategic thing to do.

Be strategically friendly. Avoid triggering a conflict.

If the CRA lawyer insults or baits you, don’t react. Do not respond in kind. Avoid getting emotional, judgmental, opinionated, defensive, or critical.

Speaking and acting politely will neutralize their tactics. And it will have a calming effect on the other side (and the discovery will end sooner).

You decide whether you will starve or feed the CRA’s lawyer’s questions and the discovery. Focus on speaking carefully and calmly rather than emotionally reacting to questions or conduct.

If the CRA’s lawyer’s conduct is uncivil, we will warn them on the record and ask them to stop. If it persists, we will tell the reporter we’re taking a 10-minute break so the CRA lawyer can compose themselves and walk out of the room. If this happens, please do not speak, and follow us.

Use the Right Pace

You will give effective answers and appear more credible when you speak at the right pace. But simply telling yourself to “slow down” will not work.

So, don’t focus on trying to go slow. Instead, take deep breaths while giving your answers. And focus on opening your mouth more when speaking.

When you take deep breaths and open your mouth more, you will naturally talk at the right pace.

Sit Quietly

Silence triggers a fear response in some people, and they keep talking.

The CRA’s lawyer might use silence to extract more information from you. They might stare at you after you’ve stopped talking, look at you in disbelief, or pretend to review their notes. Alternatively, they might move from one question to the next in a painfully slow way without any particular strategy in mind.

Resist the urge to speak.

Do not “fill the space”.

Insights

Tax partner from Price Waterhouse Coopers commending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their hands-on, focused, and diligent approach to tax law.

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

Senior VP client with an accounting and finance background praising Counter Tax Litigators for their expertise, dedication, and businesslike approach to tax dispute litigation.

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Accountant representing Fuller Landau LLP praising Counter Tax Litigators for superior communication in resolving client tax disputes.

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Retired CEO client recommending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their competence, honesty, and exceptional handling of legal matters.

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Successful business leader praising Counter Tax Litigators’ team for their professional, efficient representation, leading to a highly satisfactory decision.

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Business leader praising the Counter Tax Litigators team for going above and beyond in handling a significant tax dispute.

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.

Award from Legal 500 Canada recognizing Counter Tax Litigators as an Elite Tax Boutique for 2024.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2023-24
Excellence Award from Canadian Law Awards recognizing Peter Aprile as Litigator of the Year.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, awarded for highest overall client rating.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2021-22.
Lexpert 2022 Rising Star award for Natalie Worsfold, recognizing her excellence in tax litigation.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, peer-rated for highest level of professional excellence.
FT Innovative Lawyers award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for advanced systems enhancing tax lawyers' capabilities and outcomes.
Precedent 2022 Innovation Award honoring Counter Tax Litigators for innovation in tax litigation reports.
Fastcase 50 award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for thought leadership and innovation in tax litigation.