Canada Revenue Agency “detax” update

Canada Revenue Agency “detax” update
Canada Revenue Agency “detax” update
2:10

In or about 1995, the “detax” or “untax” movement has been moving through Canada. Since that time, detax organizations have been gaining profit holding seminars that spread the detax philosophy. Generally speaking, detaxers believe that the they are “natural persons” (as oppose to government created “artificial personages”) and that “natural persons working in their own capacity, under a private contract, for their own benefit” can structure their affairs in a tax exempt manner i.e., detaxers believe they don’t have to pay tax.

Our firm has long held that detax philosophy/argument is wrong in law. The Courts have confirmed our interpretation of the law. The CRA has successfully charged and prosecuted some of the detax promoters under paragraph 239(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act (“ITA”) for tax evasion and under subsection 464(a) of the Criminal Code for counselling others to commit fraud by evading income taxes.

...we believe that the CRA's decision to impose 50% gross negligence penalties is wrong in law and that these taxpayers should dispute the imposition of this penalty.

Consider: R. v. Porisky, 2012 D.T.C. 5037, R. v. Sydel, 2006 BCPC, CA Magazine Article, March 2002, Detax man cometh, CTV.ca, January 19, 2012, Tax-dodging guru convicted on evasion charges

We believe that the CRA’s decision to charge detax promoters for tax evasion and counselling others to commit fraud was fair and reasonable. However, we are disappointed and concerned that the CRA has recently sent notices of reassessments to unsuspecting detax participants imposing 50% gross negligence penalties under subsection 163(2) of the ITA. It appears that the detax promoters misled these taxpayers and that these taxpayers were under the innocent mistaken belief that the detax philosophy was correct. In these circumstances, we believe that the CRA’s decision to impose 50% gross negligence penalties is wrong in law and that these taxpayers should dispute the imposition of this penalty.

We encourage detax participants who have recently received notices of reassessments or notices of confirmation that impose gross negligence penalties to call our firm to discuss their tax matter.

Insights

Tax partner from Price Waterhouse Coopers commending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their hands-on, focused, and diligent approach to tax law.

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

Senior VP client with an accounting and finance background praising Counter Tax Litigators for their expertise, dedication, and businesslike approach to tax dispute litigation.

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Accountant representing Fuller Landau LLP praising Counter Tax Litigators for superior communication in resolving client tax disputes.

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Retired CEO client recommending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their competence, honesty, and exceptional handling of legal matters.

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Successful business leader praising Counter Tax Litigators’ team for their professional, efficient representation, leading to a highly satisfactory decision.

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Business leader praising the Counter Tax Litigators team for going above and beyond in handling a significant tax dispute.

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.

Award from Legal 500 Canada recognizing Counter Tax Litigators as an Elite Tax Boutique for 2024.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2023-24
Excellence Award from Canadian Law Awards recognizing Peter Aprile as Litigator of the Year.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, awarded for highest overall client rating.
Recognition from Canadian Lawyer for Counter Tax Litigators as a Top Tax Law Boutique for 2021-22.
Lexpert 2022 Rising Star award for Natalie Worsfold, recognizing her excellence in tax litigation.
Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent badge for Counter Tax Litigators, peer-rated for highest level of professional excellence.
FT Innovative Lawyers award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for advanced systems enhancing tax lawyers' capabilities and outcomes.
Precedent 2022 Innovation Award honoring Counter Tax Litigators for innovation in tax litigation reports.
Fastcase 50 award recognizing Counter Tax Litigators for thought leadership and innovation in tax litigation.