The deductibility of legal fees incurred to file a voluntary disclosure

The deductibility of legal fees incurred to file a voluntary disclosure

Subparagraph 60(o)(i) of the Income Tax Act (ITA) allows a taxpayer to deduct legal fees paid to contest an assessment of tax, interest or penalties including, but not limited to, fees incurred to provide the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) with submissions or representation at the audit, objection and appeal stages. Moreover, in Flood v. HMQ (IP), the Tax Court of Canada held that a taxpayer who incurs legal fees to contest another taxpayer’s proposed reassessment or reassessment may deduct those fees under paragraph 60(o)(i) if he has some financial interest in the proposed reassessment or reassessment.

“The Crown’s position is that the only person who can deduct the costs of objecting to an assessment under paragraph 60(o) is the person against whom the assessment was issued. I think this is an unnecessarily narrow view of the provision. For one thing, paragraph 60(o) contains no such restriction. I think it would be unreasonable to permit a stranger or volunteer who had no pecuniary interest to deduct the fees of contesting someone else’s assessment. However, if someone has a pecuniary or other interest in the outcome that was not too remote, I see no reason for prohibiting such a person from deducting this expense insured by him or her.”

Accountants, tax professionals and clients often ask our firm whether we believe that legal fees incurred related to the Voluntary Disclosures Program (VDP) are deductible under subparagraph 60(o)(i) of the ITA. We have not uncovered any case in which Tax Court has considered the deductibility of voluntary disclosure legal fees. In addition, our experience is that the CRA’s treatment related the deductibility of voluntary disclosure legal fees has been inconsistent. Simply put, the answer is unclear. However, we offer our readers the following thoughts.*

The CRA does acknowledge that reasonable fees and costs incurred to obtain advice and assistance to establish and produce tax returns for the income tax are genrally deductible.

It is submitted that taxpayers’ disclosures under the VDP may involve several steps including:

  1. advice to discuss the taxability and proper reporting of various amounts;

  2. establishing and producing tax returns;

  3. preparing and filing the voluntary disclosures application;

  4. disputing, if necessary, the CRA’s decision to deny the taxpayer’s application under the voluntary disclosure (i.e., disputing the potential assessment of penalties); and

  5. disputing, if necessary, the CRA’s proposed decision — or decision — to increase the amounts the taxpayer reported under the VDP (jointly referred to as the “VDP Steps”).

The CRA has outlined its position regarding the deductibility of voluntary disclosure fees in Technical Interpretation** Nos.: 2012-0434071E5*** and 2012-0437831E5. The CRA’s position is that legal fees to file the initial voluntary disclosure application are not deductible. “[It is the CRA’s] view that any legal or accounting fees or expenses relating to the filing of a voluntary disclosure are not deductible by the taxpayer under subsection 60(o) of the Act as they do not relate to an objection or appeal”. However, the CRA does acknowledge that reasonable fees and costs incurred to obtain advice and assistance to establish and produce tax returns for the income tax are generally deductible under section 9; and if the CRA revises — or proposes to revise — the amounts reported under the VDP, taxpayers may deduct fees incurred to dispute those proposed reassessments or reassessments under subparagraph 60(o)(i) of the ITA.

We believe that it is arguable that all or a portion of the fees related to the VDP Steps are deductible.

We believe that it is arguable that all or a portion of the fees related to the VDP Steps are deductible. Moreover, it is arguable that a careful reading of the CRA’s Technical Interpretations reveals that the CRA’s position is narrow. If the CRA’s position that “the filing of a voluntary disclosure are not deductible by the taxpayer under subsection 60(o)” is narrow and correct in law — which is not admitted and expressly denied — we believe that it is arguable that the portion of fees related to the preparation of the VDP application may not be deductible (i.e., VDP Steps No. 3) but the fees related the other VDP Steps are deductible (i.e., VDP Steps Nos. 1, 2, 4 & 5).

*First, we remind readers that this blog is for information purposes only; this is not legal advice. We encourage readers to retain a tax lawyer to discuss their unique circumstances and obtain a legal opinion based on a complete review of the law and their unique circumstances.
**Second, we remind readers that CRA Interpretation Circulars and Technical Interpretations do not have the force of law. CRA Interpretation Circulars and Technical Interpretations simply provide insight into the CRA’s administrative policy and interpretation of the law.
***Please note that Technical Interpretation No.: 2012-0434071E5 is in French. Our French is far from perfect and we attempted to translate the documents using our grade 9 French immersion skills and Google translate. We have posted the Google translate version of Technical Interpretation No.: 2012-0434071E5. We warn the reader that our translation of the CRA’s position may not be wholly accurate.

Insights

Susan Farina wearing a dark blue top and dark rimmed circular glasses brightly smiling while sitting at a desk with a pen and paperwork in front of her

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

David Cuddy in a blue button up shirt standing in a park

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Laura Couvrette smiling in a plaid top standing with arms folded

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Mark Ram standing in a office hallway wearing a white button up with dark blue jacket and dark rimmed glasses

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Klaus W. Reif sitting at a desk, dressed in a blue jacket with a silver wrist watch

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Brian Grott wearing a white button up with a red tie with white dots, softly smiling and leaning against a desk

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.

top_lawyer_23-24_v2
canadian_law_awards_2023_v2
martinsdale_hubbell_2020_overall_rating_v2
canadian_lawyer_21-22_top_law_v2
lexpert_2022_logo_v2
martinsdale_hubbell_2020_peer_rated_v2
innovative_lawyers_icon_v2
precedent_logo_v2
fastCase50_v2