Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation

Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation
Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation
1:38

The Department of Finance (Finance) has released a document entitled Consultation Regarding the Impact of Contingency Fees on the Effectiveness of the Scientific Research & Experimental Development Tax Incentive Program (the “SR&ED Document”). Finance has invited submissions related to SR&ED claims based on a contingency fee model. In particular, Finance is purportedly seeking to understand why small and medium sized businesses are attracted to this model, why service providers are attracted to this model and the quantum of fees charged.

The interesting portions of the SR&ED Document include:

There are currently no restrictions on the size of contingency fees being charged to prepare SR&ED claims. It has been reported that these fees are relatively high, and may represent 30 per cent or more of the total SR&ED benefit received by these firms. In these circumstances, it is reasonable to consider whether alternative billing practices might result in lower compliance costs without affecting the quality of service.

As the fee received by tax preparers charging on a contingency basis is related to the size and result of the claim, this billing practice has been criticized on the basis that it provides an incentive for tax preparers to encourage their clients to take aggressive positions that push the bounds of the law and its interpretation. If true, this practice would increase the costs for the Canada Revenue Agency to administer the SR&ED tax incentive program, in addition to increasing the overall fiscal risks associated with the SR&ED tax incentive program.

Insights

Background Pattern 2 with Caselaw Insights text - Choose the Right Beneficiary to Avoid Tax Pitfalls, unique expertise in overturning CRA reassessments by Counter Tax Litigators LLP.

The Enns v. Canada decision clarifies 'spouse' under section 160 of the Income Tax Act, impacting RRSP and TFSA estate planning. Jennifer Mak, along with other expert tax lawyers on our team, breaks down key insights.

Tax partner from Price Waterhouse Coopers commending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their hands-on, focused, and diligent approach to tax law.

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

Senior VP client with an accounting and finance background praising Counter Tax Litigators for their expertise, dedication, and businesslike approach to tax dispute litigation.

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Accountant representing Fuller Landau LLP praising Counter Tax Litigators for superior communication in resolving client tax disputes.

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Retired CEO client recommending Peter Aprile and the Counter Tax Litigators team for their competence, honesty, and exceptional handling of legal matters.

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Successful business leader praising Counter Tax Litigators’ team for their professional, efficient representation, leading to a highly satisfactory decision.

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Business leader praising the Counter Tax Litigators team for going above and beyond in handling a significant tax dispute.

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.