Our recommended 3-step process to respond to the CRA’s annual letter campaign

Our recommended 3-step process to respond to the CRA’s annual letter campaign

The Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”) announced, and now initiated, its 5th Annual Letter Campaign (the “Campaign”).**  The CRA is in the process of sending 33,000 letters to taxpayers that have claimed business losses, rental losses and other employment expenses on line 229 of their tax and benefit returns.  The CRA’s risk-assessment system has revealed that these types of taxpayers are higher risk to file non-compliant tax returns.

It is important that taxpayers appreciate that the receipt of the letter does not mean that their tax returns contain an error or that the CRA will audit the subject tax return.

The Campaign is designed to turn taxpayers into no-cost CRA auditors that review previously filed tax returns, identify and correct the errors.  In addition to raising revenue without any audit costs, the CRA may attempt to use a taxpayer’s failure to correct errors to support the imposition of penalties at a later date.

It is important that taxpayers appreciate that the receipt of the letter does not mean that their tax returns contain an error or that the CRA will audit the subject tax return.  Also, the Income Tax Act does not require taxpayers to correct past errors.  A taxpayer’s failure to correct an error is not a criminal offence and should not be used to support the imposition of a penalty.  Last, the CRA’s ability to reassess is – in some cases – restricted.  For example, if the taxation year to which the error relates is statute-barred and the error is an error in law or if the CRA is unable to prove that the taxpayer’s negligence or carelessness caused the error.

Simply put, if a taxpayer receives a letter, we recommend that the taxpayer pause, take a breath and gather the information needed to decide on the best course of conduct.

Our Recommended 3-Step Process

Taxpayers who receive these letters should employ the following three-step analysis to help decide the best way to proceed. 

  • First, taxpayers should review the subject tax return.  If the review reveals an error, taxpayers should determine whether the error is isolated or whether it impacts other taxation years.
  • Second, taxpayers should meet with a tax lawyer to discuss the error, the circumstances surrounding the error and the amount at stake. 
  • Third, taxpayers should gain an understanding of the type of error and actual reassessment risks.

The three-step analysis will allow taxpayers to understand and weigh their various options including, but not limited to, choosing not to correct the error on the basis that the CRA’s ability to reassess is limited or choosing to to correct the error under the Voluntary Disclosures Program.  Simply put, if a taxpayer receives a letter, we recommend that the taxpayer pause, take a breath and gather the information needed to decide on the best course of conduct.

**Please note that the CRA has not revealed any information or results related to its previous Annual Letter Campaigns.  However, we have recently submitted a request under the Access to Information and Privacy Directorate to uncover the statistics that the CRA is tracking related to the Campaign.  We will publish the CRA’s response and any material in due course. Stay tuned.

Insights

Susan Farina wearing a dark blue top and dark rimmed circular glasses brightly smiling while sitting at a desk with a pen and paperwork in front of her

What Accountants Say

Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

- Susan Farina, Tax Partner, Price Waterhouse Coopers

David Cuddy in a blue button up shirt standing in a park

What Clients Say

I’m a Senior VP with an accounting and finance background. I’ve worked with lawyers and large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute. It is very rare to encounter lawyers that combine expertise, dedication, and a businesslike approach to litigation. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Laura Couvrette smiling in a plaid top standing with arms folded

What Accountants Say

Counter Tax Litigators has worked with Fuller Landau to resolve several of our clients’ tax disputes. Counter delivers superior communication.

- Laura Couvrette, CPA, CA, Fuller Landau LLP

Mark Ram standing in a office hallway wearing a white button up with dark blue jacket and dark rimmed glasses

What Clients Say

I spent a good part of my career dealing with attorneys on innumerable matters, and found Peter to be extremely competent, open-minded and exceptionally honest. I would not hesitate to use Peter again, and highly recommend the team at Counter Tax Litigators.

- Mark Ram, Retired CEO

Klaus W. Reif sitting at a desk, dressed in a blue jacket with a silver wrist watch

What Clients Say

Counter’s representation on our behalf was well informed, professional and efficient, which ultimately resulted in a highly satisfactory decision in all aspects.

- Klaus W. Reif, President, Reif Estate Winery

Brian Grott wearing a white button up with a red tie with white dots, softly smiling and leaning against a desk

What Clients Say

I was amazed with the results. They went above and beyond, and I would recommend Counter to any person or business with a significant tax dispute.

- Brian Grott, Northland Screen Corp

How can we help you?

Recognition

Our law firm and tax lawyers regularly receive
recognition as leaders in tax controversy and litigation.

top_lawyer_23-24_v2
canadian_law_awards_2023_v2
martinsdale_hubbell_2020_overall_rating_v2
canadian_lawyer_21-22_top_law_v2
lexpert_2022_logo_v2
martinsdale_hubbell_2020_peer_rated_v2
innovative_lawyers_icon_v2
precedent_logo_v2
fastCase50_v2