Peter Aprile 2025

Peter Aprile

Senior Counsel, Tax Litigation

Peter focuses on tax litigation, helping mid-market businesses and affluent families retain the economic value they create.

Peter has dedicated himself to representing Canada’s leading private companies and high-net-worth individuals in tax disputes since 2006.

Throughout this time, he has assisted businesses and individuals in retaining the economic value they create by countering the CRA’s attempts to extract tax revenue. Many recognize him as a leading figure in Canadian tax controversy and litigation. 

Peter’s recent work includes:  

  • acting for a corporate group facing a $27 million tax dispute related to whether some subsidiaries were Canadian resident corporations. This matter includes 12 Tax Court appeals and a Federal Court application.  
  • resolving four tax appeals related to non-compliance for overseas asset reporting. Peter worked to set a target outcome for each taxpayer based on a realistic application of the law to the facts and exceeded the expected outcome in all four cases. Peter's work saved the clients over $4.2 million.  
  • successfully negotiating a settlement for five Tax Court appeals related to a private company and its shareholders. Peter's work reduced the group’s tax assessments by 91 per cent. 
  • successfully persuading the CRA to abandon its position related to taxation of overseas income and saving a client $2.3 million. 
Peter Aprile is a very hands on and practical tax lawyer who is very focused and diligent. He is a pleasure to work with.

— Susan Farina, Tax Partner, PriceWaterhouseCoopers

Peter is smart, personable, timely and efficient, which are four qualities that don’t always go together! I give Counter my highest recommendation.

- David Daniels, Principal, Daniels Capital Group

Peter Aprile is a very smart, practical tax litigation lawyer. He has successfully assisted my clients. I have no hesitation in recommending Counter Tax Lawyers.

— Mihkel Holmberg, President, Holmberg Watson Professional Group

Additionally, Peter leads Counter’s ‘1% for Good’ impact initiative. This pro bono initiative engages in projects aimed at transforming the Canadian tax dispute system, focusing on increasing accountability within the CRA and the DoJ.

Peter started his career alongside Richard Fitzsimmons, one of Canada’s top tax litigators. After Richard’s passing, Peter evolved his strategy and approach to tax disputes, culminating in the founding of Counter Tax Litigators.  

Outside his professional responsibilities, Peter enjoys time with his wife and two children. A dedicated reader, Peter spends most of this time quietly reading and thinking to understand more. 

Latest Insights

Explore more insights

The Strategic Choice After Reassessment

Comparing the CRA’s self-adjudication stage with independent oversight in appeal
 

 

 

Read more >
Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Get in touch

Insights

How Courts Decide When a Transaction Can Be Read Two Ways

How Courts Decide When a Transaction Can Be Read Two Ways

November 24, 2025 - Key Takeaways Penn Ventilator v. HMQ shows how disputes evolve when a transaction supports two viable case theories: one tied to the structure, the other to the business’s economic behaviour. ...

Control and Economic Reality in Cross-Border Dividend Disputes

Control and Economic Reality in Cross-Border Dividend Disputes

November 24, 2025 - Key Takeaways Inconsistent cross-border descriptions created tension between the structure’s design and its economic reality. Risk and benefit flowed to different entities across jurisdictions,...

CRA Reassessments Behave Like Capital Events

CRA Reassessments Behave Like Capital Events

November 24, 2025 - Key Takeaways CRA’s incentive design produces earlier, larger, and more persistent reassessments. The Large Corporation Rules convert those assertions into temporary capital constraints. For...

CRA Audits and Disputes: A New Test of Control and Judgement

CRA Audits and Disputes: A New Test of Control and Judgement

November 03, 2025 - Key Points CRA can now compel sworn questioning. The Income Tax Act authorizes auditors to require oral testimony under oath during audits, bringing executives directly into the record. Early...

When CRA Scrutiny Shifts from Mechanics to Interpretive Requirements

When CRA Scrutiny Shifts from Mechanics to Interpretive Requirements

October 29, 2025 - Key Takeaways CRA challenges often evolve from mechanical to interpretive tests. The decisive factor is not a structure’s mechanics but whether its interpretive elements hold up under scrutiny. ...

Foreign Tax Interest Denied, Tax Court Loss Contained — Bank of Montreal v. HMK

Foreign Tax Interest Denied, Tax Court Loss Contained — Bank of Montreal v. HMK

September 22, 2025 - Key Takeaways The Tax Court confirmed that foreign tax interest is not deductible — BMO lost on the law. The result was predictable, but BMO's strategy maximized potential upside while containing...

Explore more insights >