2025-03-18 - Bonnie Chiapponi Headshot

Bonnie Chiapponi

Operations Lead

Drives operational excellence to enhance tax litigation performance.

Bonnie leads strategic initiatives that optimize Counter Tax Litigators’ operations, ensuring efficiency, seamless execution, and alignment with the firm’s tax litigation strategy. Her work strengthens firm-wide processes, enabling lawyers to maintain focus on securing high-stakes litigation outcomes.

With a background in executive operations and process improvement, Bonnie ensures that Counter Tax Litigators’ infrastructure supports the demands of complex tax disputes. She specializes in streamlining workflows, integrating cross-functional initiatives, and reinforcing the systems that drive litigation performance.

This structured, execution-driven approach enhances Counter Tax Litigators’ ability to deliver precision, strategy, and successful tax litigation results.

I’m a Senior VP who has previously hired large law firms. I was referred to Counter to fix a tax dispute from the sale of an investment property I co-owned with two non-residents. I wish I hired Counter sooner.

- David Cuddy, Senior Vice-President, Finance & Business Operations, CFL

Counter worked smart and hard to help us win the appeal. We worked together to reorganize all the evidence, and we presented a clear and coherent case. We won and avoided roughly $600,000 in tax, penalties, and interest.

- Fred Levy, CPA, CA, LPA, MBA

Simply the best is how I would describe Counter Tax. They were on top of everything that CRA and the MOF were throwing at us, and kept us informed and well-advised on next steps. By the way, they won both cases.

- John Locke, President, Campbellford Wholesale Inc.

Latest Insights

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Insights

The Three Critical Inflection Points in CRA Challenges

The Three Critical Inflection Points in CRA Challenges

September 07, 2025 - Peter Aprile, Senior Counsel at Counter LLP, describes three inflection points that define how CRA challenges develop and are resolved. The framework reflects insights drawn from years of...

Mutual Fund Trust Disputes: When Form Without Execution Collapses

Mutual Fund Trust Disputes: When Form Without Execution Collapses

August 21, 2025 - Key Takeaways Benefit without cost invites scrutiny: Courts scrutinize tax structures that offer benefit without tradeoff, and when they find this gap, they side with the CRA and uphold the...

Surplus Cash and the Active Asset Test: Lessons from Ehresman

Surplus Cash and the Active Asset Test: Lessons from Ehresman

August 14, 2025 - Key Takeaways No inference of intent: Courts rejected the claim that surplus cash was earmarked for decommissioning in the absence of contemporaneous reserves, allocations, or disclosures. ...

Strategic Deferral of Departure Tax: Security, Liquidity, and Control

Strategic Deferral of Departure Tax: Security, Liquidity, and Control

August 11, 2025 - Key Insights at a Glance Deferral as strategy: Departure tax can be deferred without interest when acceptable security is posted, preserving liquidity during transition. Forms of security: CRA...

Transfer Pricing Disputes: How Forum Choice Alters Outcomes

Transfer Pricing Disputes: How Forum Choice Alters Outcomes

June 30, 2025 - Key Takeaways Forum defines outcomes: The taxpayer’s appeal was quashed without the merits ever being heard because the chosen forum lacked jurisdiction. Procedure equals substance: Courts...

Framing Gaps in SR&ED Disputes Shift Control to CRA

Framing Gaps in SR&ED Disputes Shift Control to CRA

June 05, 2025 - Key Takeaways Framing gap: The Tax Court accepted CRA’s framing because Vortex’s reply lacked engineering support and legal positioning. In other disputes, when claims were framed with qualified...