Key Takeaways The appeal failed because the parties continued after the win path had closed. The hearing created no real opportunity or upside. The case continued without a clear stop-point, turning t...
In large-corporation CRA disputes, the period immediately following reassessment is defined by unresolved conditions. Information is incomplete. Interpretations remain unsettled. Exposure cannot yet b...
Keybrand Foods Inc. v. HMQ, shows how interest-deductibility disputes, and others like them, are shaped after reassessment as the objection record crystallizes the explanation of the business situatio...
Key Takeaways CRA recharacterization does not apply where arm’s length pricing remains available. Courts distinguish pricing disputes from disputes over transaction structure. The objection record set...
A CRA dispute begins when CRA issues its reassessment. Management’s first test begins when it explains it to directors, shareholders, lenders, investors, or partners. The structure varies. The dynamic...
Key Takeaways The Tax Court’s mandate allows the DOJ and CRA to introduce new alternative theories late in litigation, which can increase cost, delay the litigation timeline, and introduce litigation ...
Key Takeaways Loss consolidation transactions attract CRA scrutiny even when they align with Parliament’s design. The mechanical structure rarely drives the dispute – the interpretive record does. Bus...
Key Takeaways Penn Ventilator v. HMQ shows how disputes evolve when a transaction supports two viable case theories: one tied to the structure, the other to the business’s economic behaviour. Courts r...
Key Takeaways The mechanics worked, but the Court focused on whether the reorganization produced a real economic loss or merely a paper one. That distinction shaped the GAAR outcome. The decisive batt...
Key Takeaways Inconsistent cross-border descriptions created tension between the structure’s design and its economic reality. Risk and benefit flowed to different entities across jurisdictions, shapin...