Jennifer_Square

Jennifer Mak

Associate, Tax Litigation

Jennifer resolves tax controversies with a holistic view to deliver the best overall result.

Jennifer is an associate lawyer at Counter Tax Litigators. Her practice encompasses all aspects of tax controversy and litigation.

Jennifer has represented clients in appeals before the Tax Court of Canada and Federal Court of Canada.  She regularly works on complex objections and audits for private companies and high-net-worth individuals involving international and domestic issues.  

Jennifer has successfully resolved tax controversies involving residence for tax purposes, GST/HST, applications for judicial review, shareholder and employee benefits. 

Jennifer is a mentor with the Federation of Asian Canadian Lawyers. Each year, she helps two Asian Canadian law students navigate the legal profession.  

Natalie, James and Jennifer have been wonderful to work with for our numerous legal cases. They understand there’s a job to be done and they get it done with minimal fuss and detailed written follow-up.

- Verified Client Feedback for the Legal 500: 2024 Elite Tax Boutique Award

The CRA accepted our submissions and conceded 100% before the hearings. I am so happy with Counter’s representation and the result. Justice has been served and my bruised faith restored.

- Kuldeep Sharma, President, Courtyard by Marriott Toronto/Brampton

There is no ego; just a singular focus on getting the right result. I look forward to continuing to work with the Counter team.

- Vikram Gulati, CPA, CGA

At every step, Counter kept me informed and made practical recommendations. Counter negotiated a settlement that reduced my tax position by 75% and made the Agency drop all the penalties and interest.

- Narinder Seehra, CEO, MSR Holdings Inc.

Latest Insights

Framework Graphic 1 – representing Counter Tax Litigators' integrated approach to client service, combining advanced systems and deep legal expertise to resolve high-stakes tax disputes.

How can we help you?

Insights

The Three Critical Inflection Points in CRA Challenges

The Three Critical Inflection Points in CRA Challenges

September 07, 2025 - Peter Aprile, Senior Counsel at Counter LLP, describes three inflection points that define how CRA challenges develop and are resolved. The framework reflects insights drawn from years of...

Mutual Fund Trust Disputes: When Form Without Execution Collapses

Mutual Fund Trust Disputes: When Form Without Execution Collapses

August 21, 2025 - Key Takeaways Benefit without cost invites scrutiny: Courts scrutinize tax structures that offer benefit without tradeoff, and when they find this gap, they side with the CRA and uphold the...

Surplus Cash and the Active Asset Test: Lessons from Ehresman

Surplus Cash and the Active Asset Test: Lessons from Ehresman

August 14, 2025 - Key Takeaways No inference of intent: Courts rejected the claim that surplus cash was earmarked for decommissioning in the absence of contemporaneous reserves, allocations, or disclosures. ...

Strategic Deferral of Departure Tax: Security, Liquidity, and Control

Strategic Deferral of Departure Tax: Security, Liquidity, and Control

August 11, 2025 - Key Insights at a Glance Deferral as strategy: Departure tax can be deferred without interest when acceptable security is posted, preserving liquidity during transition. Forms of security: CRA...

Transfer Pricing Disputes: How Forum Choice Alters Outcomes

Transfer Pricing Disputes: How Forum Choice Alters Outcomes

June 30, 2025 - Key Takeaways Forum defines outcomes: The taxpayer’s appeal was quashed without the merits ever being heard because the chosen forum lacked jurisdiction. Procedure equals substance: Courts...

Framing Gaps in SR&ED Disputes Shift Control to CRA

Framing Gaps in SR&ED Disputes Shift Control to CRA

June 05, 2025 - Key Takeaways Framing gap: The Tax Court accepted CRA’s framing because Vortex’s reply lacked engineering support and legal positioning. In other disputes, when claims were framed with qualified...