Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation

Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation
Scientific Research & Experimental Development (SR&ED) consultation
1:38

The Department of Finance (Finance) has released a document entitled Consultation Regarding the Impact of Contingency Fees on the Effectiveness of the Scientific Research & Experimental Development Tax Incentive Program (the “SR&ED Document”). Finance has invited submissions related to SR&ED claims based on a contingency fee model. In particular, Finance is purportedly seeking to understand why small and medium sized businesses are attracted to this model, why service providers are attracted to this model and the quantum of fees charged.

The interesting portions of the SR&ED Document include:

There are currently no restrictions on the size of contingency fees being charged to prepare SR&ED claims. It has been reported that these fees are relatively high, and may represent 30 per cent or more of the total SR&ED benefit received by these firms. In these circumstances, it is reasonable to consider whether alternative billing practices might result in lower compliance costs without affecting the quality of service.

As the fee received by tax preparers charging on a contingency basis is related to the size and result of the claim, this billing practice has been criticized on the basis that it provides an incentive for tax preparers to encourage their clients to take aggressive positions that push the bounds of the law and its interpretation. If true, this practice would increase the costs for the Canada Revenue Agency to administer the SR&ED tax incentive program, in addition to increasing the overall fiscal risks associated with the SR&ED tax incentive program.

Insights

Leveraged growth leads to CRA reassessments and disputes. This insight explains how exposure modelling, objection strategy, and dispute readiness affect a company’s ability to reduce or overturn a reassessment.

Counter Sphere 1 Image, with “CRA Reassessments Behave Like Capital Events” title text, Counter Tax Litigators LLP: strategic leadership in complex CRA disputes.

CRA’s audit architecture drives reassessments that behave like capital market shocks inside private companies. This article examines the structural forces at play and how executives maintain control once CRA formalizes its position.